Final project 1 grader¶

The final evaluation utilizes ready submissions, which is why the grader checks before submission that all required sub-graders can be found with the given git commit hash. If they are not found, the work cannot be submitted.

Steps for the final evaluation, also see the image below:

1. 200 points >= pass criteria, requires the following:

   Grader	Same hash
   Successful completion of functional and integration tests	✅
   Pedantic compilation successfully	✅
   Perftests have been executed without timeouts or seg.fault errors	✅
   Perfestimate excecuted (same hash)	✅
   Valgrind has been run; passing not required	✅
   Docs grader passed	Any hash

2. 150 points - optimization points, points for each optimized function (70p for get_places_alphabetically, 80p for get_places_distance_increasing). Optimization requires that the function operates more efficiently when run frequently compared to a single run. In the chart shown, the number of iterations is 20.
3. 250 points - performance test points. Students can get statistical info about the efficiency of their work in comparison with others through a separate results server (referred to as eduML, check the left sidemenu). Score categories (ranges) are defined followingly:
   • 250p: <= 1.350.000 (command count)
   • 200p: <= 3.300.000
   • 150p: <= 5.500.000
   • 100p: <= 7.000.000
   • 50p: <= 10.000.000