Summary questions on attacks and attackers

The questions are randomised per student, and for these questions you will receive only correct/incorrect feedback. In Problem 1, the unpleasant phenomena mentioned in this module are examined from the perspectives of criminality and the victim. There may be one or more correct options. In addition to the listed options, there may be others that fit the question, so do not take this as the whole truth.

In Problem 2, at least one correct option is randomly assigned to each student, usually more. For a partially correct answer, Plussa gives incorrect feedback, but the task is accepted when the score is 12 or higher and the points are shown on a yellow background. Points start to accumulate only once more than half of the selections in the task are correct. From the score, it is not possible to directly determine whether an individual selection is correct or not.

Which are not necessarily crimes?
Which are inevitably crimes?
Which do not belong to the category of being enabled by networks but to the category of being enhanced by networks, whether they are crimes or not? (Do not consider the novelty of the phenomena, but the effect of computer networks.)
In scams, the victim does not immediately know they are a victim — and does not always believe it even in the end. In some of the following cases, the attacker may also achieve their goal without the victim being aware of it, at least initially. Select these.
In which cases might the victim never know they were a victim, even if the attacker has achieved their objective?
In which phenomena may there not necessarily be a victim even when they are successful?
In which cases is the victim (or group of victims) not precisely defined in advance?

Select the correct statements. You may choose one or more options.

Posting submission...